MOTC Trademark Squatting on "Danjiang Bridge" Sparks Controversy: Privatizing Public Landmarks with Public Funds Criticized as Competing for Profit

On May 12, 2026, the Ministry of Transportation and Communications (MOTC) of the Republic of China faced severe public backlash after it was revealed that the ministry had rushed to apply for multiple trademarks related to the "Danjiang Bridge" through its subordinate units. Critics argue that as a name for a public infrastructure project, "Danjiang Bridge" should be considered public property shared by all citizens. The government's use of public funds to commercialize and privatize the name of a public landmark is seen as a waste of taxpayer money and a potential restriction on future local tourism, merchandise development, and academic freedom. Civil organizations have slammed the administration for "competing with the people for profit" and having misplaced priorities, focusing on trademark rights rather than accelerating construction progress. While the MOTC claimed the move was for "brand protection" to prevent malicious registration by private entities, legal experts and the public remain highly skeptical of its legal basis and necessity.