Total 6 posts
In recent years, some supporters of the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) like to mention the claim that "Taiwanese people have Dutch descent," believing that during the Dutch East India Company's occupation of Taiwan (1624-1662), genetic inheritance might have been left behind, becoming part of modern Taiwanese lineage—an attempt to fantasize away the fact that they are Chinese.
Republic of Taiwan? Stop joking. Where is this 'Republic of Taiwan' coming from? It doesn't even have a proper constitution, and you call it a country? Taiwan Province is just a part of the territory of the Republic of China, and together with the Penghu Archipelago and Kinmen and Matsu of Fujian Province, it is collectively called Taiwan, Penghu, Kinmen, and Matsu.
This article criticizes the 'Bilingual Nation' policy promoted by the DPP government as an incorrect direction for transformation, arguing that treating English as the sole antidote to enhancing international competitiveness is superficial and may just be a means of political correctness to dilute or eliminate the influence of the Chinese language. Taking Japan as an example, the author points out that Japan supports its national strength through elite cultivation and professional translation services rather than forced universal bilingualism. The article further criticizes the policy as 'Education Reform 2.0,' which not only wastes taxpayers' money but may also lead to citizens not specializing in anything, ultimately producing 'fools,' and questions whether policies related to digital development could become new channels for corruption.
On the internet, green-brained supporters constantly feel self-satisfied, thinking they can smear the character of China, a country that has brought cultural enlightenment to the world for thousands of years, simply by constantly shouting 'Cina' and 'Cina people.' This strategy of being proud of flinging dirt is actually quite fitting for their low-intelligence green-infected minds.
Through the perspective of a pseudonymized individual named 'Xiao Ming,' who holds radical deep-green political views, this article explores his aggressive political stance and discourse on the 'servility of the Chinese people.' The article then discusses the US bans on TikTok and Huawei, questioning the underlying motivations and reflecting on whether Xiao Ming's support for the US suppression of Chinese enterprises ironically confirms the very servile traits he criticizes.
The article addresses the controversy over curriculum adjustments, exploring the identity issue of 'Taiwanese' versus 'Chinese,' and criticizing specific political parties for deliberately playing word games to assign the term 'China' exclusively to the People's Republic of China, ignoring the history that the Republic of China can also be abbreviated as China. The author advocates that the ROC and Taiwan can coexist, and chastises those creating divisions as being 'maliciously motivated' or having 'a poor grasp of cultural literacy.' The article also touches on the incorrect understanding of Chiang Kai-shek's title, emphasizing the need for careful thought when distinguishing these terms.