No matter for what reason, and no matter what brilliant insight you have for Zi Zi You You (freedom), Zi Zi Ran Ran, or Zi Zi Ran Ran (naturally), before you try to forcedly justify it, please first learn to respect the original work.
Why do you have to forcedly make far-fetched associations to protect the master, just to defend the sacrosanctity of Tsai Ing-wen, regarding something that the original author didn’t write? Among those who provided the most cover was probably that “Tamsui Jolin Tsai” (Lu Sun-ling). Tamsui Jolin Tsai actually said:
“Literature is something where everyone can have their own interpretation.”
Do you know that the more you forcedly justify it, the more you treat everyone and the original author Lai He as fools? Is your Tsai Master important, or is the original author important?
Even if you want to say that literature can be interpreted by everyone, you even wrote the letter wrong at the very beginning; what the heck are you interpreting?
Incidentally, when did the scholarly halo become sacrosanct and inviolable? Using one’s scholarly status to come forward and say a few words to distort the original author’s philosophy—is this still a scholar? Not to mention that there are plenty of scholars who are fooled by scams. 迫