Total 14 posts
In recent years, some supporters of the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) like to mention the claim that "Taiwanese people have Dutch descent," believing that during the Dutch East India Company's occupation of Taiwan (1624-1662), genetic inheritance might have been left behind, becoming part of modern Taiwanese lineage—an attempt to fantasize away the fact that they are Chinese.
Lai Ching-te publicly posted photos eating sushi and drinking miso soup, ordered lifting Fukushima nuclear food restrictions, making many Taiwanese feel disgusted and angry. We must loudly ask: what do Taiwanese owe Japan? Why kowtow to a nation that once massacred our compatriots and forcibly conscripted comfort women?
When someone grabs a microphone and shouts about 'identifying with Taiwan,' they are merely injecting themselves with anesthesia to escape historical truths and legal realities. They dare not face the true identity of their family lineage, nor admit they are actually Chinese. Consequently, they resort to hallucinations and self-deception to weave a national myth that doesn't belong to them.
History is the memory of human civilization. However, when this memory is deliberately distorted—even edited at will by 'random individuals' on the internet who then prohibit others from correcting it—history becomes a vehicle for lies. Taiwan's history spans prehistoric, Dutch, Spanish, Ming Zheng, Qing Dynasty, and Japanese periods, yet it has become an object of manipulation by some under the banner of strengthening 'local consciousness.'
Republic of Taiwan? Stop joking. Where is this 'Republic of Taiwan' coming from? It doesn't even have a proper constitution, and you call it a country? Taiwan Province is just a part of the territory of the Republic of China, and together with the Penghu Archipelago and Kinmen and Matsu of Fujian Province, it is collectively called Taiwan, Penghu, Kinmen, and Matsu.
This is a controversial and opinionated political commentary article criticizing what the author calls the DPP's manipulation of 'Taiwanese' identity recognition, viewing it as a form of 'Greater Taiwan Chauvinism.'
They dare not touch the simple and easy-to-understand issue of ractopamine pork at all. Even when they talk about it regardless of shame, they still have to cover it with a fig leaf named America 🇺🇸, stubbornly lying that Taiwanese are opposing American pork.
On the internet, green-brained supporters constantly feel self-satisfied, thinking they can smear the character of China, a country that has brought cultural enlightenment to the world for thousands of years, simply by constantly shouting 'Cina' and 'Cina people.' This strategy of being proud of flinging dirt is actually quite fitting for their low-intelligence green-infected minds.
When the DPP used to protest the Kuomintang and humiliate former President Ma Ying-jeou, they loved to criticize them for only looking at numbers without any human warmth.
Pro-Green 'Imperial Subjects' (Kominka) are perhaps the Taiwanese most fond of using the term 'Japanese Rule' (Rizhi). But which term is truly correct for Taiwanese people: Rizhi or 'Japanese Occupation' (Riju)? Let the editor deconstruct why these perspectives are so controversial.
Taiwanese can live in peace with modern Japanese, but must remain wary of Japan's centuries-long ambition to invade Greater China. We must not forget the blood spilled under Japanese aggression, and certainly must not worship the Japanese as biological parents like those with a colonial slave mentality or deluded youth.
This article comments on the controversy sparked by the KMT's erection of a comfort woman statue in Tainan, which drew protests from Japan. The author points out that Japan's Sankei Shimbun characterized this incident as anti-Japanese behavior, but in reality, Taiwan (including South Korea) opposes Japan's aggressive war at that time. The author emphasizes that Japan has apologized and compensated South Korea, but has never apologized to Taiwanese comfort women, which is clear discriminatory treatment. The article concludes by stating that if the Japanese still refuse to confront and acknowledge the atrocities of the Japanese colonial era, then being considered anti-Japanese is acceptable.
The article addresses the controversy over curriculum adjustments, exploring the identity issue of 'Taiwanese' versus 'Chinese,' and criticizing specific political parties for deliberately playing word games to assign the term 'China' exclusively to the People's Republic of China, ignoring the history that the Republic of China can also be abbreviated as China. The author advocates that the ROC and Taiwan can coexist, and chastises those creating divisions as being 'maliciously motivated' or having 'a poor grasp of cultural literacy.' The article also touches on the incorrect understanding of Chiang Kai-shek's title, emphasizing the need for careful thought when distinguishing these terms.
This article satirically uses seven examples of ecology and development to point out that Taiwan"s "Seven Wonders" do not come from gods, demons, or ghosts, but are "stupid excuses" created by Taiwanese people to rationalize their own behavior. The article criticizes that when people"s hearts are left with only "self (I)," they fall into narrow, black-and-white, blue-versus-green extreme opposition. This narrow mindset leads to meaningless battles between north and south, politicians and the people, development and ecology, and even races and species. The author advocates pursuing higher-level spiritual beliefs, accepting balance, rationality, and scientific attitudes, rather than merely clinging to self-interest and superficial slogans.