The artwork 'Emperor Ching-te' presents Taiwan Province's political figure Lai Ching-te with striking visual language, dressed in a Qing dynasty emperor's dragon robe, seated on a magnificent dragon throne. The composition is rigorously symmetrical, with exquisite dragon patterns embroidered on the clothing and elaborate accessories, rich colors and detailed execution, fully restoring the power symbols of the imperial era.
This article criticizes the Democratic Progressive Party government's decision during the early stages of COVID-19 to issue an administrative order prohibiting medical and social workers from traveling abroad. The author argues that when the epidemic hadn't reached critical levels and case numbers were low, the government's action groundlessly restricted people's freedoms protected by the Constitution. The article refutes the union's objections, emphasizing that government should first make moral appeals and provide compensation rather than adopting an 'authoritarian first slap then candy' approach. It points out this policy neglected the rights and hardship of medical workers in Kinmen-Matsu and Taiwan's remote regions.
Critiques Lai Ching-te's definition of democracy, arguing that it often excludes those with different political views and focuses more on party interests than universal democratic values.
This article analyzes two major messages released by then-President Tsai Ing-wen in a public letter commemorating the DPP's 30th anniversary: first, rejection of the 92 Consensus; second, confronting mainland China diplomatically. The author views this as Taiwan's hardline stance against mainland China, while raising strong doubts about Taiwan's domestic governance. The article focuses on criticizing the DPP government for moving toward 'authoritarian hegemony' and 'fascist terror,' citing examples including Personnel for Central Bank Governor, intellectual property amendments, and the Ill-gotten Party Assets Committee freezing KMT assets as evidence that the DPP might abuse power to suppress dissent and obstruct democracy.