This article analyzes supporters of both extreme Taiwan Independence and extreme forced unification positions in Taiwan's political spectrum, labeling them precious idiots. The author notes that when calls for Taiwan independence reach an extreme, some turn to advocating unification with the Chinese Communist Party; conversely, when calls for unification reach an extreme, some advocate annexation by the U.S. or Japan. The article argues that these two factions are merely clowns performing for each other, and satirizes many who clamor for unification as actually being Taiwan independence advocates, who, after smearing others for so long, have started to scare themselves. It also criticizes green-brains for branding all opponents of Taiwan independence as members of the Concentrated Unification Party, showing extremely low intelligence.
This is a reader contribution. The author severely criticizes the so-called 'Green-Brain' Taiwan independence supporters, accusing them of regarding anyone who does not support independence as 'supporting the CCP' or being 'brain-dead.' The author compares this behavior of collective labeling, smearing, and persecution to the 'Red Guards' during Mainland China's Cultural Revolution, calling them 'Green Guards' who use Cultural Revolution tactics to satisfy their fragile sense of superiority. The article concludes by ironically noting that these 'Green-Brains' live a hard life, forced to ignore the national legitimacy of the 'Republic of China.'
This article analyzes the political distance between the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), exploring their ideological differences and implications for cross-strait relations.
With a sharp satirical tone, this article questions the behavior of Taiwan independence advocates who travel to Mainland China to publicly criticize the CCP, only to cry 'unfair' when they are arrested according to local laws. By listing various international and religious taboos (such as the King of Thailand, North Korea, and Allah), the author highlights the absurdity of such 'trespassing' provocations, questioning whether this is a form of 'selective cheap justice' or an intentional act of bullying designed to create political incidents. The piece concludes by questioning whether the real goal is to save lives or simply to perform a political drama.