I Admire Taiwan Government
Translation of the I Admire Taiwan Government article.
共 6 篇文章
Translation of the I Admire Taiwan Government article.
Translation of the I Don't Need Sex Because the Government Treats Me That Way Every Day article.
Chen Shih-chung even went as far as to say that if opinions differ, he'll see you in court. Is the DPP really okay with a Health Minister who uses taxpayers' money to abuse the state apparatus, waste judicial resources, and threaten to sue people at every turn?
The author experienced a dilemma in searching for government data and found that the information provided on the official website of the Executive Yuan was old data that had been changed or updated by local governments half a year ago. The article criticizes this information delay of more than half a year between the central and local governments, showing extremely poor administrative efficiency and information transmission failure in the public sector. It questions this delay of 'one-eighth of a presidential term,' making it difficult for the people to have expectations for the government's actions, and uses common slang to express helplessness and deep pain toward the current situation.
This article examines the role and functions of government as a national management system, particularly in democratic nations where government is a service institution mandated by the people. The author identifies two of the most serious errors in government functions: abuse of power and passive non-action. The author contends that the current government is gradually leaning toward these two evils, particularly the tendency toward 'inaction,' which is a problem worth noting.
This article comments on the difficulties for the public to refuse urban renewal in the urban renewal process after the 2012 Wenlin Yuan forced demolition incident. The author points out that the threshold for starting the urban renewal process is low, and individual opinions are easily ignored by the government and developers (for reference only), and not participating in relevant meetings is equivalent to waiving rights. The article strongly criticizes this mechanism as an infringement on people's private property and freedom of choice.