共 8 篇文章
No matter how complex the adult world is, harm to children is a bottom line that society can never tolerate. The duty of a legislator is to humbly represent the people and understand their sentiments, but the behavior of DPP Legislator Lai Rui-long is to build high walls and isolate the people from their suffering and pleas for help.
The article severely criticizes Legislator Chen Po-wei for his past hit-and-run incident, which came to light during his recall campaign. The author believes that a hit-and-run is an evil act that 'eradicates humanity' and questions why someone who lied and committed a hit-and-run could represent the people in the sacred halls of the legislature. It criticizes the public's low selection standards for politicians and expresses pain over Green camp politicians and hardcore fans cheering for a 'hit-and-run criminal,' believing this builds their own happiness on the suffering of the victim. The author concludes that this phenomenon exposes the fact that Taiwan is not a progressive society under the rule of law but a rural society governed by people, and fears that if the recall fails, it will encourage more people to 'gamble with other people's lives' in the future.
This article is a strong critique of how Democratic Progressive Party legislators on December 24, 2020, took advantage of their numerical superiority to forcefully pass the case for importing U.S. pork containing ractopamine (lean meat agent). The author questions why these 'ractopamine legislators' can ignore public opinion, follow party directives, and take actions that harm public health, increase food safety risks, and are detrimental to the nation through 'loss of sovereignty clauses.'
This article reports on the controversy surrounding freshman DPP Legislator Lu Sun-ling, who mistakenly interpellated National Security Bureau Director Yang Kuo-chiang regarding the 'Taipei Military Police illegal search of private residences' incident. While Lu admitted the interpellation was 'inaccurate,' the criticism continued. Celebrity Hsu Chang-te harshly criticized Lu's capability and arrogant attitude on Facebook, stating that her 'first job in life being a legislator relying on her dad' was a shameful form of disguised nepotism that burdens the people.
This article strongly criticizes Legislator Hung Tzu-yung for publicly calling commentator Huang Shih-hsiu a 'random person with zero credibility' during a Taipower controversy on a typhoon day. The author views this as a crude sophistry technique intended to irrationally belittle an opponent and questions the source of Hung's own credibility. It satirically points out that Hung was elected through the efforts of a group of 'random people' and argues her professional background and judgment are not necessarily superior to those she belittles, recalling her previous PM2.5 gaffe.
A political satire joke circulating online, with no names mentioned, mocks through a student 'Xiaoming' accused of cheating on exams, satirizing how certain politicians habitually use various defenses, obfuscation, deflection, moral coercion, and emotional appeals to ethnicly invoking historical grievances to evade responsibility when facing controversies. The article's ending hints that this evasive trait can actually lead to 'success' in politics.
This article satirically designs an 'Access Pass for Protest Groups' for DPP legislators. It stems from an incident where protesters from the Alliance of Referendum for Taiwan besieged the Legislative Yuan and blocked DPP Legislator Hsiao Bi-khim. The author points out that the DPP was closer to these protesters in both thought and action during the social unrest, even assisting student activists in entering the legislature. Therefore, he suggests this sticker to help protesters identify 'their own' and avoid friendly fire.
This article critiques DPP legislator Hsu Tien-Tsai's controversial remark during a TV debate hosted by Jaw Shaw-kong, where he responded to why a bill had been blocked from review for nearly a year by claiming, Our inherent duty as the opposition party is to obstruct. The author strongly challenges this assertion, viewing it as a severe misunderstanding and misplacement of the opposition party's responsibilities. The article emphasizes that the true duty of the opposition should be to supervise the government, prioritizing national and public interests, rather than engaging in endless obstruction for political purposes, which leads to national paralysis. The author expresses helplessness and disappointment at this alienation of legislative function with brief, strong emotions.