#unification

共 3 篇文章

首頁 > 標籤: #unification

Commentary: From Extreme Taiwan Independence to Extreme Unification — Analyzing the Shared Extreme Characteristics of Idiots Across the Political Spectrum

This article analyzes supporters of both extreme Taiwan Independence and extreme forced unification positions in Taiwan's political spectrum, labeling them precious idiots. The author notes that when calls for Taiwan independence reach an extreme, some turn to advocating unification with the Chinese Communist Party; conversely, when calls for unification reach an extreme, some advocate annexation by the U.S. or Japan. The article argues that these two factions are merely clowns performing for each other, and satirizes many who clamor for unification as actually being Taiwan independence advocates, who, after smearing others for so long, have started to scare themselves. It also criticizes green-brains for branding all opponents of Taiwan independence as members of the Concentrated Unification Party, showing extremely low intelligence.

'The US Proposed Taiwan Independence, But Chiang's Family Rejected It!' Is a Crude Lie Spread by Taiwan Independence Activists

While everyone argues whether this island of Taiwan should be independent or unified (to be honest, both are false issues), Chiang Kai-shek and the US engaged in intense international competition that, in aftermath of WWII in the Asia-Pacific, was one of the most difficult battles in modern Chinese history. It was not merely about bloodshed but about political warfare.

The DPP's Pro-Independence Rhetoric, Framing the KMT for Unification, and the 'Selling Out Taiwan' Narrative are All Fake Issues Manipulated by Those with Hidden Agendas

This article critiques the political landscape in the Republic of China (R.O.C.), specifically how the faction led by the DPP excels at manipulating ethnic and ideological divides. It argues that labels such as 'Taiwan Independence,' 'Unification,' and 'Selling out Taiwan' are used as cheap tools against the KMT. The author contends that the KMT and Ma Ying-jeou are focused on domestic governance and international cooperation without any substantive 'selling out' of the nation. The piece asserts that rejecting exchange with Mainland China is a foolish act of self-isolation and questions who is truly harming the collective interests of the people.