After DPP's 30th Anniversary, Two Major Messages Tsai Ing-wen Publicly Released
時事焦點

After DPP's 30th Anniversary, Two Major Messages Tsai Ing-wen Publicly Released

This article analyzes two major messages released by then-President Tsai Ing-wen in a public letter commemorating the DPP's 30th anniversary: first, rejection of the 92 Consensus; second, confronting mainland China diplomatically. The author views this as Taiwan's hardline stance against mainland China, while raising strong doubts about Taiwan's domestic governance. The article focuses on criticizing the DPP government for moving toward 'authoritarian hegemony' and 'fascist terror,' citing examples including Personnel for Central Bank Governor, intellectual property amendments, and the Ill-gotten Party Assets Committee freezing KMT assets as evidence that the DPP might abuse power to suppress dissent and obstruct democracy.

#Tsai Ing-wen #DPP #92 Consensus #Cross-strait Relations #Authoritarianism #Party Assets Committee #Intellectual Property #Freedom of Speech
中文

President Tsai Ing-wen delivered a public letter yesterday to all DPP members at the party’s 30th anniversary celebration, clearly conveying two messages: First, Tsai will not recognize the 92 Consensus; Second, rather than compromising and reconciling due to economic difficulties, Tsai will formally initiate diplomatic confrontation with mainland China. This public letter wasn’t merely a message to DPP members but to all ROC citizens, and a resounding slap to mainland China.

Tsai Ing-wen’s public letter is extremely serious, and we must take it seriously—particularly regarding Taiwan’s own domestic issues.

🙅‍♀️ Message One: DPP Forms Authoritarian Hegemony, Preparing to Eliminate Dissenting Voices

This letter represents the DPP forming authoritarian hegemony, preparing to eliminate any media, enterprises opposing the DPP line.

  • Controlling Economic Lifelines: For example, the recently criticized Peng Hui-nan has publicly stated he’ll formally retire in 2018. When Tsai’s government appoints whoever as central bank governor, it’ll signal controlling Taiwan’s economic lifeblood.
  • Controlling Freedom of Speech: For example, the Tsai government passed intellectual property amendment changing original lawsuit-upon-complaint infringement cases to non-complaint litigation—public prosecution. This means prosecutors can independently investigate and prosecute suspected copyright-using media and websites. This amendment’s significance in today’s social media environment is clear: if government wants to control people’s freedom of speech, it only needs prosecutors to investigate news media or content sites on suspected infringement pretenses. It’s like pro-independence activists repeatedly suing Ma Ying-jeou, trying to lower his status to imprisoned Chen Shui-bian’s level, yet none have succeeded to date. But their main goal isn’t genuinely imprisoning Ma (even if they truly wish so), but rather stifling dissenting voices, binding hands of free movement and speech.

⚔️ Message Two: Using Every Means Against the CCP, Resembling Fascist Terror Times

This letter represents the DPP using every means—whether illegal or unreasonable—concentrating resources against the CCP, resembling fascist terror times.

  • Directing Banks to Freeze Assets: For example, through the seemingly unconstitutional Ill-gotten Party Assets Committee, the DPP forcefully directed banks to freeze KMT assets intended for employee salaries. A government able to demand banks confiscate and freeze others’ assets without evidence or communication resembles Nazi Hitler by 87%.

🚩 Message Three: Using Past Communist Purge Methods to Smear Opponents

This letter represents the DPP using past Communist purge tactics to smear opponents.

  • Fabrication Incidents: For example, Wu Den-yih’s fake recording incident, pre-election vote-buying allegations in Kaohsiung, various Ma administration maneuvers, and recent developments with a host recently hired from Era News attacking China Times news to smear them.

🚨 Summary: One-Party Government’s Hidden Worries

These three methods have actually appeared in past elections, becoming increasingly perfected over years. With the DPP’s advantage of complete control, I believe they’ll become supreme weapons for attacking opponents, obstructing democratic development, and preventing competitor competition. But such one-party government wielding ideological weapons is absolutely no blessing for the ROC, Taiwan, or its citizens.

Finally, obviously, Tsai Ing-wen and the DPP lack capacity to confront mainland China internationally, and certainly cannot break through in international diplomatic space relying on Taiwan’s hollowed-out capabilities over many years. With power corruption and desperation, we reasonably suspect the DPP and Tsai will ultimately only direct their guns inward, rationalizing their slogans, consolidating their control—this remains the DPP’s primary reason for urgently eliminating KMT forces.

Related Reports:

  1. The ill-gotten party assets committee’s intentions are obvious to everyone, resembling Nazi Hitler by 87%
  2. Duterte: I Really Admire the Taiwan Government
  3. Stupid, the Problem Isn’t Pensions, It’s Tsai Ing-wen
  4. Authoritarian Pension Cuts Pushing Taiwan into Developing Nations Status
  5. Chinese Diplomat Wang Yi vs. DPP Gu Liksiung
  6. Did SET Television assist Hualien campaigning? The truth about the misplaced news item “Outrageous! After husband sexually assaulted, female councilor beat and threatened victim: dare report and I’ll sue you”
  7. Why Did Tsai Ing-wen Apologize to Indigenous Peoples? Is Her Identity Japan’s Representative to Taiwan or ROC President?

更多時事焦點相關文章