I often see people saying that voter demographics have changed, everyone is tired of blue-green bitter conflict.
Why do blue and green fight bitterly? Stripped of all pretense, it’s simply for their own interests. Once interests cease, changing colors also happens frequently. The audience below is always cheering for the actors performing on stage.
The colors themselves aren’t the problem, nor have they ever been ironclad determinants of thought and character. Strictly speaking, the two colors blue and green represent not just political parties, but rather left and right, hawks and doves—the ideological content has always been the perennial political drama of struggle versus peace playing out through the ages… (being deceived and exploited by fake progressives is also frequently happening)…
The only neutrality lies in the Taoist concept of non-action by the ancient philosopher Laozi—following nature’s natural course of action, eliminating all artificial thought and control, returning all people to their most original pure simplicity. Otherwise it’s false neutrality.
So those claiming transcendence from blue and green have recently emerged in full force. One type exudes the essence of struggle (peace usually doesn’t need disguise), they wrap their own selfish desires in the candy coating they call “transcendent neutrality.” Another type is attracted by this colored candy.
I’m often thought of as pro-blue, whether I’m blue I don’t know, but I always know I hate the essence of those who love struggle. I frequently express arguments opposing green viewpoints, therefore I get classified as a blue-brain. Actually I don’t care one bit how those people who just try to apply labels see me…
“Ma the dog,” 689, “Chinese people,” “white thief yi,” “Lianpang,” “fat pig,” “blue worms,” “sick creature,” “Chinese pig” and so on—none of the malice behind these labels represents righteousness, and I’m even ashamed to speak of them. I even admire people who can put these filthy words in their mouths and speak them eloquently, even calling this kind of pollution transmission cognitive warfare (I specifically Googled to find the proper usage)…
Ancient wisdom constantly warns us that when a lie is continuously accepted by the masses, it becomes the truth. When filled-with-malice language constantly saturates our environment, people choose to believe. This is the cognitive warfare behavior starting from politics, brainwashing people.
So I don’t watch SET News political discussion shows. Most of their conversation content is so illogical and filled with attorney-like selective argument, constantly stimulating that tiny detective inside my brain’s questioning mechanism. Several times just hearing the full-of-fallacy conversation content outside, I guessed it must be SET News, and my guesses are usually right.
The simplest example is Democrat attorney Guo Zheng-liang. His hard-reasoning sophistry in SET Television, and his narrative logic in CTi Television, clearly display two completely different reasoning styles. This massive difference is visible at a glance to those with eyes to see, yet no one criticizes this double standard of human nature, even encouraging the DPP to further strengthen this double standard, making people feel sad that Taiwan’s future seems to be in the hands of such types of people.